The last time I corresponded with the Board of Niños de Mexico was more than a month ago via email on June 12th.
For context, on April 28th I met with three board members to discuss the need for an independent investigation, to hear their perspectives, and to share the testimonies of some young people who had been abused in Niños care by Niños staff.
I had reached out to the Board in early April and received a message back from the Board Vice-President Scott Neuhart inviting me to meet with a subset of the Board.
Present at the meeting were Bob (Robert) Wideman, the President of the Board; Scott Neuhart, the Vice-President of the Board; Pam Ralls, the Board Secretary; and Robert Rodriguez, a board member who goes to Mexico each year.
At this meeting in the presence of all, Scott Neuhart explained that the board had already met twice with the Christian organization GRACE, an "evangelical organization specializing in awareness, education, and investigations of sexual abuse handling by religious organizations" (from GRACE's website) to discuss what a potential investigation would look like, a process which was then explained to me in detail:
1. The first step would be a document review. GRACE would review various documents such as meeting minutes, emails, social media posts, information I had sent out etc., related to the subject at hand.
2. The second step would be a questionnaire sent out to key individuals asking whether they had witnessed any abuse, etc., and if they had anything else they wanted to add and would be willing to speak to a GRACE investigator.
3. The third step would be GRACE reaching out to specific individuals with requests for in-depth interviews based on the questionnaires.
4. From the following step, more interviews would be generated.
5. The final step would be the compilation of all this information into a 40-65 page report, complete with GRACE's findings and further recommendations.
This process would take about a year.
I was very pleased with this information and felt it was exactly what we needed to finally get to the bottom of the organization's handling of the child sexual abuse claims which I had been bringing to the attention of the Board.
The Board explained two concerns with this potential process.
Bob explained that the Board was not "thrilled" with the idea of the investigation taking a year.
I responded that there was no way around the fact that any investigation of substance would take time, especially one that would involve two countries and two languages.
I was also told that they did not want to do an investigation if it did not include current kids and that they were not sure GRACE could work with the minors currently at Niños without also working with the governmental body in Mexico that legally holds their custodianship.
However, this is not a real problem because each of the abuse cases I brought to the attention of the Board involves young people now exited from Niños. Since the abuse and the mishandling of the abuse by failure to report, both crimes, would have taken place in Niños care and by Niños staff (some of whom which are still on staff with the ministry) the Board and the ministry must take responsibility even if the young people are not currently at Niños.
Furthermore, at this Board meeting, the Board admitted they knew that the current Executive Director had failed at least once to report an incident of sexual abuse, as was his legal responsibility under Mexican law.
In addition, it was made clear the Board still did not know anything about one of the most egregious cases of sexual abuse and mishandling, which is at the beginning of its legal process in Mexico. When I asked the Board about it, they looked around dumbfounded until I moved on. (This shows that the Executive Director is still not giving all the relevant information to the Board).
At this Board meeting, statements from five young people who had been sexually abused inside of Niños were read, statements which implicated both the current Executive Director (for failing to report sexual abuse) and the current Administrative Director (for unlawful sexual contact with a minor).
I was told that the Board wanted to work with me and move forward together.
I was told that the Board would want me to work with them to agree on the scope of the interview.
I asked Bob Wideman whether an independent investigation was something the organization had decided definitively on or whether it was a proposal that could be brought back to the rest of the Board for a vote and voted down.
Bob's answer to me was,"What I can tell you, Eric, is that we are very serious about an independent investigation."
Then, a few weeks later, in light of this and much more information, they told me they were not doing it.
The following is the email I was sent by the Board (to which I will respond and then share the actual email I sent back to the Board).
1). Dear Mr. Miller, As the President of the Ninos board I want to thank you again for bringing your concerns to the board’s attention.
I wrote the Board in early April, but it was the Board who specifically invited me to hear about their move towards and independent investigation. Otherwise, the meeting never would have transpired.
2.) We are currently working through internal and external investigations to ensure the safety of the children in our care. This includes but is not limited to recommendations by DIFEM and JAPEM.
Here we see an example of the subtle misdirection that has come to characterize the response of the Board.
We had an entire meeting predicated on whether the current executive director mishandled sexual abuse claims of multiple kids, resulting in continued and/or multiplied abuse, kids who were abused in Niños care, but have since graduated, and the response of the Board is about "investigations" related to the "safety of the children in our care."
In other words, nothing about the potential crimes of their staff members or justice for the abuse victims.
There is no independent investigation ongoing into the Executive Director's handling of sexual abuse claims. The Board is not qualified to conduct such an investigation, the Mexican government does not have such an investigation ongoing, and the Executive Director cannot investigate himself.
Does the safety of the children in the care of Niños mean having an Executive Director who may have knowingly concealed abused claims from the authorities and an Administrative Director who had unlawful sexual contact with a minor?
And how can they know whether these things occurred unless they investigate?
2.) We know you have concerns about the leadership and direction of Ninos and I have no doubt that you believe you are doing what is best for the children. You must understand that the same passion for doing what is right is in the heart of each one of the staff and board members of Ninos.
I fundamentally do not believe or "understand" that "passion for doing what is right is in the heart of each one of the staff and Board members of Niños" on the basis of an abundance of evidence.
- Was it a "passion for doing what is right" that led the executive director to conceal a report of abuse of one of the children in his care from authorities (which the Board acknowledge happened) which resulted in the victim being left in the same vicinity as their victimizer?
- Was it a "passion for doing what is right" that led the Board to "forgive" (in the words of board member Robert Rodriguez) the executive director for this crime, which was a crime against a child, not the Board, and thus not for the Board to "forgive," rather than hold him accountable before the law, like they would surely expect if such a thing had happened to their own child?
Was it a "passion for doing what is right" that led the executive director of the institution to fail to report several other cases of child sexual abuse (which he denies) while claiming he did not know he was a mandated reporter?
- Was it a "passion for doing what is right" that ostensibly led the administrative director to force himself sexually on a teenager?
- Was it a "passion for doing what is right" that has led the Board to misdirect supporters, give half-information, and half-truths as I have tried to painstakingly show in various posts and videos?
- Was it a "passion for doing what is right" that led the Board to lead me to believe that they were finally going to do the right thing and pursue an independent investigation only to turn around and refuse?
Furthermore, it is not just myself that has concerns about the direction and leadership of Niños, but each of the young people who have given their testimony to the Board, many more young people I have spoken to (inside and outside the institution), churches that have dropped their support, individuals that have dropped their support, former staff, and so many others.
The Board knows this is not about the concerns of a single individual working in isolation or they would never have given me the time of day in the first place.
3.) To that end, while being laser focused on the children currently in our care, we are acutely aware of the accusations of the peer on peer, and other abuse in the past that you have brought to our attention. We are exploring programs to give an opportunity for closure and a way forward for the young men and women no longer in our care. At this time an independent investigation will not be part of that process.
Again, there is not a word about abuse mishandling, and of the various abuses which I brought to the attention of the Board and which several young people bravely spoke to, these are dismissed as simply "other abuse in the past."
Imagine a staff member had killed a kid at Niños and there were questions about whether another Niños staff member knowingly concealed that crime from the authorities?
What if there were good reasons to believe it happened several times over?
Would the Board still accept "programs to give an opportunity for closure and a way forward" for "other murders in the past" as a just response the families of the victims and to honor the dignity of those killed?
If not, why is such a response acceptable when a kid is sexually abused by a Niños staff member while in Niños care?
The truth is it's not, whether the Board wants to publicly acknowledge it or not. What follows is my email response to the Board:
To the Board of Niños:
For decades, leadership within Niños de Mexico has allowed its staff to prey sexually on the children they have been tasked with protecting (just yesterday two more victims bravely came forward with their stories). And when those kids grow up and leave, they are no longer the institution's problem. I am reminded of what Mordecai said to Esther:
"For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance for the Jews will arise from another place, but you and your father's house will perish." (Esther 4:14)
Even if the Board of Niños continues to fail the victims of sexual abuse within the institution, help and deliverance from God will come from one place or another. However, what becomes of the whitewashed tomb you have erected in Mexico is up to you.
When the Board is ready to come back to the table, I will be here. Until then, this advocacy work will continue.